Forest biodiversity conservation - between classification and emotional engagement
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4539-4523
Keywords:
Abstract
Biodiversity conservation in European forests operates at the intersection of evidence-based guidelines, bureaucratic governance, and practical fieldwork, shaping how non-human life is valued and managed. This study examines the creation and implementation of the Forest Target Species Guidelines (WZAK) and its associated digital Forest Nature Conservation Information System (WNSinfo) in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, by drawing from political ecology, science and technology studies, and more-than-human geography. The research highlights how conservation is co-produced through scientific classification, institutionalized bureaucracy, and affective engagements with non-human life. Findings from semi-structured interviews and participant observation illustrate that forest conservation governance is shaped as much by institutional and bureaucratic dynamics as by ecological considerations. A fragmented institutional landscape, characterized by sectoral divisions and legal constraints, generates tensions in data accessibility and conservation implementation. While the WZAK conceptually promotes a conservation approach based on forest structures, in practice, conservation primarily targets the selection of certain species. That allows for easier navigation of political and financial constraints, underscoring the persistent friction between systemic conservation strategies and emotional commitments to individual species protection. The WNSinfo, intended to integrate biodiversity data into decision-making, remains marginalized due to institutional ambiguity and bureaucratic inertia, exemplifying the challenges of digital conservation governance. By critically examining the intersections of classification, bureaucracy, and conservation practice, this study contributes to broader discussions in political ecology, demonstrating how conservation unfolds as a political process of negotiation, experimentation, and human-non-human entanglement. It calls for flexible, adaptive governance frameworks that account for the relational and contested nature of forest conservation in political landscapes.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in the journal. The journal retains no copyright.
Adams B. 2020. Digital animals. The Philosopher 108(1). Available from: https://www.thephilosopher1923.org/post/digital-animals.
Allamel-Raffin C, Gangloff J-L, Gingras Y. 2024. The characteristics and diversity of experimentation in the sciences. In: Allamel-Raffin C, Gangloff J-L, Gingras Y, editors. Experimentation in the sciences: comparative and long-term historical research on experimental practice. Springer Nature Switzerland. p. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58505-0_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58505-0_1
Ash J, Kitchin R, Leszczynski A. 2018. Digital turn, digital geographies? Prog Hum Geogr. 42(1):25-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664800
Bauriedl S. 2016. Politische Ökologie: nicht-deterministische, globale und materielle Dimensionen von Natur/Gesellschaft-Verhältnissen. Geogr Helv. 71(4):341-351. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-341-2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-341-2016
Biermann C, Mansfield B. 2014. Biodiversity, purity, and death: conservation biology as biopolitics. Environ Plan D: Soc Space. 32(2):257-273. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13047p DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d13047p
BMUV. 2024. Nationale Strategie zur biologischen Vielfalt. Retrieved 08.04.2025 from https://www.bmuv.de/themen/naturschutz/allgemeines-und-strategien/nationale-strategie.
Bowker, G. C. 2000. Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science, 30(5): 643-683. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030005001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030005001
Bowker GC, Star SL 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001
Braun B 2004. Nature and culture: on the career of a false problem. In A Companion to Cultural Geography (pp. 151-179). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996515.ch11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996515.ch11
Braunisch V, Hauck F, Dalüge N, Hoschek M, Ballenthien E, Winter M-B, Michels H-G 2020. Waldzielartenkonzept und Waldnaturschutz-Informationssystem: Instrumente zur Artenförderung im Staatswald von Baden-Württemberg. Standort.wald 51:53-76.
Braverman I 2014. En-listing life: red is the color of the threatened species list. In Collard R, Kathryn G, eds. Critical animal geographies. Routledge/Earthscan 2015 SUNY Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-001:184-202. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315762760-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315762760-11
Braverman I 2017. Anticipating endangerment. BioSocieties 12(1):132-157.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-016-0025-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-016-0025-0
Brockhaus M, Angelsen A 2012. Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: A political economy framework. Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices:15-30.
Brockhaus M, De Sy V, Di Gregorio M, Herold M, Wong G Y, Ochieng R, Angelsen A 2024. Data and information in a political forest: The case of REDD+. Forest Policy and Economics, 165, 103251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103251
Castree N. 2005. Nature. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203448410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203448410
Castree N, Braun B. 2001. Social nature: theory, practice and politics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Charvolin F. 2024. Faune France: amateur naturalists' attachment and indebtedness in a citizen science biodiversity database. Sci Cult 33(3):321-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2022.2025775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2022.2025775
Clough PT, Halley J. 2007. The affective turn. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822389606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822389606
COPE. 2023. COPE position - authorship and AI - English. Accessed 2025 Apr 15. https://doi.org/10.24318/cCVRZBms DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cCVRZBms
Cvitanovic C, Karcher DB, Breen J, Badullovich N, Cairney P, Dalla Pozza R, Duggan J, Hoffmann S, Kelly R, Meadow AM, Posner S. 2025. Knowledge brokers at the interface of environmental science and policy: a review of knowledge and research needs. Environ Sci Policy 163:103973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103973
Despret V. 2004. The body we care for: figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body Soc 10(2-3):111-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042938
EEA. 2024. The Natura 2000 protected areas network. Accessed 2025 Apr 8. Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/biodiversity/natura-2000/the-natura-2000-protected-areas-network
EU. 2025. Types of legislation. Accessed 2025 Feb 3. Available from: https://european-union.europa.eu/institutions-law-budget/law/types-legislation_en
FAO. 2024. State of the world's forests 2024: forest sector innovations towards a more sustainable future. Available from: https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/publication/state-world's-forests-2024-forest-sector-innovations-towards-more-sustainable-future-0_en
Flick U. 1995. Qualitative Forschung: Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften. Rowohlt.
ForstBW. 2015. Die Gesamtkonzeption Waldnaturschutz mit den Waldnaturschutzzielen 2020. https://www.forstbw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/ForstBW_Gesamtkonzeption_Waldnaturschutz.pdf
Forsyth T. 2003. Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science. Routledge; London and New York. 336 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203017562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203017562
FVAa. Waldnaturschutz-Informationssystem Retrieved 13.11.2024 from https://wnsinfo.fva-bw.de/waldnaturschutz-informationssystem/
FVAb. Waldnaturschutz-Informationssystem - Auerhuhn Karte. Retrieved 20.01.2025 from https://wnsinfo.fva-bw.de/karte/
FVAc. Waldnaturschutz-Informationssystem - Waldwiesenvögelchen Steckbrief. Retrieved 20.01.2025 from https://wnsinfo.fva-bw.de/arten/wald-wiesenvoegelchen/
FVAd. Waldnaturschutz-Informationssystem - Auerhuhn Steckbrief. Retrieved 20.01.2025 from https://wnsinfo.fva-bw.de/arten/auerhuhn/
Gesing F, Amelang K, Flitner M, Knecht M. 2019. NaturenKulturen-Forschung: eine Einleitung. In: Gesing F, Knecht M, Flitner M, Amelang K, editors. NaturenKulturen. p. 7-50. transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839440070-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839440070-001
Guest G, Namey EE, Mitchell ML. 2013. Participant observation. In: Collecting qualitative data: a field manual for applied research. SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506374680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506374680
Haraway D. 2008. When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway DJ. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: feminism and technoscience. Vol. 30. Routledge.
Haraway DJ. 2003. The companion species manifesto: dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm; University Presses Marketing; Chicago, Ill., Bristol. https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/999944308902121
Hinchliffe S. 2007. Geographies of nature: societies, environments, ecologies. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446212516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446212516
Hinchliffe S. 2008. Reconstituting nature conservation: towards a careful political ecology. Geoforum 39(1):88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.09.007
Hinchliffe S, Kearnes MB, Degen M, Whatmore S. 2005. Urban wild things: a cosmopolitical experiment. Environ Plann D Soc Space 23(5):643-658. https://doi.org/10.1068/d351t DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d351t
Jarić I, Courchamp F, Correia RA, Crowley SL, Essl F, Fischer A, González-Moreno P, Kalinkat G, Lambin X, Lenzner B, Meinard Y, Mill A, Musseau C, Novoa A, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Pyšková K, Robertson P, von Schmalensee M, Jeschke JM. 2020. The role of species charisma in biological invasions. Front Ecol Environ 18(6):345-353. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2195
Kaiser R. 2024. Research interviews: a practical guide to qualitative data. Springer Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-45333-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-45333-6
Konold W, Bauhus J, Hein S, Klein A-M, Lenz R, Pekrun C, Steidle J, Wallner K. 2020. Sonderprogramm zur Stärkung der biologischen Vielfalt der Landesregierung Baden-Württemberg. Abschlussbericht 2018/2019 - Evaluation durch das wissenschaftliche Fachgremium.
Latour B. 1993. We have never been modern. Porter C, trans. Harvard University Press.
Latour B. 2004. Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press.
Latour B, Woolgar S. 1986. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820412
Lindahl KB, Söderberg C, Lukina N, Tebenkova D, Pecurul M, Pülzl H, Sotirov M, Widmark C. 2023. Clash or concert in European forests? Integration and coherence of forest ecosystem service-related national policies. Land Use Policy 129:106617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106617
Lloyd G. 2007. Nature versus culture reassessed. In: Cognitive variations: reflections on the unity and diversity of the human mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199214617.003.0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199214617.003.0008
Lorimer J. 2007. Nonhuman charisma. Environ Plann D Soc Space 25(5):911-932. https://doi.org/10.1068/d71j DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d71j
Lorimer J. 2008. Counting corncrakes: the affective science of the UK corncrake census. Soc Stud Sci 38(3):377-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707084396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707084396
Lorimer J. 2015. Wildlife in the Anthropocene: conservation after nature. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816681075.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816681075.001.0001
LUBW. 2024. Natur und landschaft in Baden-Württemberg. Retrieved 08.04.2025 from https://umweltportal.baden-wuerttemberg.de/umweltdaten-bericht-2024/natur-und-landschaft
Manicas PT. 1992. Nature and culture. Proc Am Philos Assoc 66(3):59-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/3130661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3130661
Mattissek A, Wiertz T. 2014. Materialität und Macht im Spiegel der Assemblage-Theorie: Erkundungen am Beispiel der Waldpolitik in Thailand. Geogr Helv 69(3):157-169. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-157-2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-157-2014
Mayring P, Fenzl T. 2019. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In: Baur N, Blasius J, eds. Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. p. 633-648.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_42
MLR. 2018. Das Sonderprogramm zur Stärkung der biologischen Vielfalt. Stuttgart: Ministerium für Ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz Baden-Württemberg. Retrieved from https://um.baden-wuerttemberg.de/fileadmin/redaktion/m-um/intern/Dateien/Dokumente/2_Presse_und_Service/Publikationen/Umwelt/Naturschutz/Sonderprogramm-zur-Staerkung-der-biologischen-Vielfalt.pdf
MLR. 2020. Bericht zur Lage der Natur in Baden-Württemberg 2020. Stuttgart: Ministerium für Ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz Baden-Württemberg.
Molhuizen T, Beumer K, Dorresteijn I. 2025. Who to revive? Explaining charismatic species bias in the selection of de-extinction candidate species. Environ Plan E Nature Space 0(0):25148486241310698. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486241310698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486241310698
Myung-Ae C. 2016. More-than-human geographies of nature [새로운 정치생태학을 위한 비인간지리학의 인간-자연 연구]. J Korean Geogr Soc 51(5):613-632. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE07064402
Nost E, Goldstein JE. 2022. A political ecology of data. Environ Plan E Nature Space 5(1):3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211043503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211043503
Ojani C. 2023. Experimenting with fog: Environmental infrastructures, infrastructuring environments, and the infrastructure of infrastructure. Environ Plan E Nature Space 6(1):24-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221101458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221101458
Ott A. 2025. Ontological conflict over forests in Inari/Aanaar: Sámi's fight for preservation and renewal. Environ Sci Policy 163:103957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103957
Papadopoulos D. 2018. Experimental practice: Technoscience, alterontologies, and more-than-social movements. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002321
Peltola T, Ratamäki O. 2023. Sharing epistemic power: digitally mediated wolf monitoring in Finland. Sci Cult 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2023.2214148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2023.2214148
Peluso NL, Vandergeest P. 2001. Genealogies of the political forest and customary rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. J Asian Stud 60(3):761-812. https://doi.org/10.2307/2700109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2700109
Peluso NL, Vandergeest P. 2011. Political ecologies of war and forests: Counterinsurgencies and the making of national natures. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 101(3):587-608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.560064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.560064
Peluso NL, Vandergeest P. 2015. The International Handbook of Political Ecology. In: Bryant RL, editor. Chapter 12 Political forests. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936172.00020
Radder H. 2009. The philosophy of scientific experimentation: a review. Autom Exp 1(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1759-4499-1-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1759-4499-1-2
Rantala S, Swallow B, Paloniemi R, Raitanen E. 2020. Governance of forests and governance of forest information: Interlinkages in the age of open and digital data. For Pol Econ 113:102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102123
Rheinberger HJ. 1997. Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford University Press.
Schöneich S. 2021. 'On a hot day in the field...': The art of writing ethnographic vignettes. Ethnoscripts 23(1). https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/ethnoscripts/article/view/1666
Simberloff D. 2018. Nature, culture, and natureculture: The role of nonnative species in biocultures. In: Rozzi R, May RH Jr, Chapin III FS, Massardo F, Gavin MC, Klaver IJ, Pauchard A, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D, editors. From biocultural homogenization to biocultural conservation. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99513-7_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99513-7_12
Singh NM. 2018. Introduction: Affective ecologies and conservation. Conserv Soc 16(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_18_33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_18_33
Soga M, Gaston KJ. 2016. Extinction of experience: The loss of human-nature interactions. Front Ecol Environ 14(2):94-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225
Turnhout E. 2018. The politics of environmental knowledge. Conserv Soc 16(3):363-371. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_17_35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_17_35
Von Essen E, Turnbull J, Searle A, Jørgensen FA, Hofmeester TR, Van Der Wal R. 2023. Wildlife in the digital Anthropocene: Examining human-animal relations through surveillance technologies. Environ Plan E Nature Space 6(1):679-699. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211061704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211061704
Waterton C. 2003. Performing the classification of nature. Sociol Rev 51(2_suppl):111-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00454.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00454.x
Whatmore S. 2002. Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219713
Zariņa A, Vinogradovs I, Svece A. 2024. Wildlife as an affective multiplicity: Approaching Deleuzo-Guattarian pack-animals. Environ Plan E Nature Space 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486241301992 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486241301992